An
intensive debate is raging in the country about revival of democracy. What is
missing in this debate is an in depth analysis to identify real reasons because
of which democracy did not work in Pakistan.
The
first essential condition for growth of democracy in any country is acceptance
by all the sovereignty of the people. The sovereign people elect
representatives from amongst themselves to rule the country with power the
‘sovereign’ delegates to them for a time period. The representatives are
required to rule to the fullest satisfaction of people. The people reserve the
right to remove those who don’t come up to their expectations in the next
general elections no more no less. No one else has a right to dismiss elected
delegates.
What
makes democracy effective is the democratic political process whereby every
political party strictly abides by inner party democracy and party elections.
The first requirement is democracy at grass root level.
The
other aspect is the people’s participation and their empowerment to directly
handle things in their day to day affairs. One of the biggest means is
democracy working at lowest administrative level being administered by elected
representatives, not by bureaucracy.
Democracy
did not take roots in Pakistan due to a number of reasons, the foremost being that no
effort was ever made to politically educate the people. As the very foundation
of democracy – political education of people remains weak due to mass
illiteracy and extremely low standard of education. Secondly, hardly any one of
the national political leaders is or ever was from among the common people.
They were and still are elites – top barristers, little holders, bureaucrats,
landlords and now also crony capitalists. An other reason is the absence of
democratic political process. Basically, it is the result of non-existence of
democracy with in the political parties.
This
is unfortunate but more unfortunate is failure of party leadership to acquire
political education themselves. The problem Pakistani society faces are many
but some of them, the most daunting ones are mass illiteracy division on
provincial, linguistic and ethnic basis and further sub-divisions into castes
tribes and communities, religious sectarianism and violence, suffocating grip
of feudal culture with disdain for those doing manual work, respect for
parasites, worried business class, nouveau riche capitalists lacking enterprise
and above all feudal ownership of vast areas of land and the feudal treating
peasants as slaves. There are many more such problems our society faces.
But
none has been known to political leadership and therefore, never highlighted in
political literature. And this is all inherited. The Muslims of India suffered
from all this social sickness but to the leaders then Hindus and British were
the only problems. So these problems remained unaddressed. Congress was more or
less like Muslim League but inner party democracy was slightly more practised
in it than in League. Nevertheless, India does have a developing and evolving democracy why?
Because after independence constitution was quickly formulated and national
elections regularly held. That triggered a political process of sorts which
went on taking roots because national elections which follow democratic
political process and hold regular party elections. The result is that majority
of members in national and state legislature are working politicians, who come
from middle and working classes and even from lower castes. A substantial
number of central and state ministers are from lower castes or working class.
Had
the constitution been quickly formulated and enforced in Pakistan and elections
held regularly after independence the political process would have taken roots
here as in India. That process was subverted first by Ghulam Muhammad by
dissolving sovereign constitutional assembly, then by Ayoub Khan seizing power
by ousting legal government, followed by Yahya Khan, Ziaul Haq, Ghulam Ishaque
Khan, Farooque Leghari and General Pervez Musharaf.
Now
the assemblies have completed their tenure of five years first time in the
history of Pakistan. The democracy was been
introduced at the grass root level. This is revival of democracy to some extent
but there is lot of work to do in this regard.
No comments:
Post a Comment